UB Conquense vs CD Manchego analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
31.8%
Win probability
1.05
Expected goals
6-0
<0%
+6
<0%
5-0
0.1%
6-1
<0%
+5
0.1%
4-0
0.5%
5-1
0.1%
6-2
<0%
+4
0.7%
3-0
2%
4-1
0.6%
5-2
0.1%
+3
2.7%
2-0
5.8%
3-1
2.4%
4-2
0.4%
5-3
<0%
+2
8.6%
1-0
11%
2-1
7%
3-2
1.5%
4-3
0.2%
+1
19.6%
28.6%
Draw
0-0
10.5%
1-1
13.3%
2-2
4.2%
3-3
0.6%
4-4
<0%
0
28.6%
39.6%
Win probability
1.21
Expected goals
0-1
12.7%
1-2
8%
2-3
1.7%
3-4
0.2%
4-5
0%
-1
22.5%
0-2
7.6%
1-3
3.2%
2-4
0.5%
3-5
0%
-2
11.4%
0-3
3.1%
1-4
1%
2-5
0.1%
-3
4.2%
0-4
0.9%
1-5
0.2%
2-6
0%
-4
1.2%
0-5
0.2%
1-6
0%
-5
0.3%
0-6
0%
-6
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
UB Conquense
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Jan. 1996 |
MAN
0 - 2
UBC
61%
23%
16%
|
26 | 29 | 3 | 0 |
| 21 Jan. 1996 |
UBC
0 - 1
TOM
24%
27%
50%
|
27 | 40 | 13 | -1 |
| 14 Jan. 1996 |
SBA
0 - 1
UBC
36%
28%
36%
|
26 | 20 | 6 | +1 |
| 07 Jan. 1996 |
PUE
2 - 2
UBC
75%
17%
9%
|
26 | 30 | 4 | 0 |
| 17 Dec. 1995 |
UBC
4 - 0
CAM
68%
20%
12%
|
25 | 21 | 4 | +1 |
Matches
CD Manchego
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Jan. 1996 |
MAN
3 - 0
AZU
80%
14%
6%
|
37 | 22 | 15 | 0 |
| 21 Jan. 1996 |
HEL
0 - 2
MAN
39%
28%
33%
|
36 | 29 | 7 | +1 |
| 14 Jan. 1996 |
MAN
0 - 0
VIL
73%
17%
9%
|
36 | 28 | 8 | 0 |
| 07 Jan. 1996 |
MAN
4 - 0
ALM
85%
12%
4%
|
36 | 20 | 16 | 0 |
| 17 Dec. 1995 |
DAI
1 - 3
MAN
17%
28%
55%
|
36 | 20 | 16 | 0 |