UB Conquense vs CD Manchego analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
63%
Win probability
1.71
Expected goals
8-0
<0%
+8
<0%
7-0
0.1%
8-1
<0%
+7
0.1%
6-0
0.3%
7-1
0.1%
+6
0.4%
5-0
1.2%
6-1
0.2%
7-2
<0%
+5
1.4%
4-0
3.4%
5-1
0.8%
6-2
0.1%
+4
4.2%
3-0
7.9%
4-1
2.2%
5-2
0.2%
6-3
<0%
+3
10.3%
2-0
13.8%
3-1
5.1%
4-2
0.7%
5-3
0.1%
+2
19.7%
1-0
16.1%
2-1
9%
3-2
1.7%
4-3
0.2%
+1
26.9%
23.2%
Draw
0-0
9.4%
1-1
10.5%
2-2
2.9%
3-3
0.4%
4-4
<0%
0
23.2%
13.8%
Win probability
0.65
Expected goals
0-1
6.1%
1-2
3.4%
2-3
0.6%
3-4
0.1%
-1
10.2%
0-2
2%
1-3
0.7%
2-4
0.1%
-2
2.8%
0-3
0.4%
1-4
0.1%
2-5
0%
-3
0.6%
0-4
0.1%
1-5
0%
-4
0.1%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
UB Conquense
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Apr. 1986 |
SSR
0 - 0
UBC
49%
27%
24%
|
34 | 29 | 5 | 0 |
| 06 Apr. 1986 |
UBC
3 - 0
FUE
70%
20%
10%
|
33 | 24 | 9 | +1 |
| 30 Mar. 1986 |
RMC
0 - 1
UBC
77%
16%
8%
|
32 | 39 | 7 | +1 |
| 23 Mar. 1986 |
UBC
0 - 0
SEG
50%
26%
25%
|
32 | 33 | 1 | 0 |
| 16 Mar. 1986 |
LEG
1 - 0
UBC
74%
18%
9%
|
33 | 37 | 4 | -1 |
Matches
CD Manchego
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Apr. 1986 |
MAN
1 - 0
ALC
55%
24%
21%
|
28 | 31 | 3 | 0 |
| 06 Apr. 1986 |
AZU
1 - 1
MAN
48%
28%
24%
|
29 | 27 | 2 | -1 |
| 30 Mar. 1986 |
MAN
1 - 0
ARA
62%
22%
17%
|
28 | 28 | 0 | +1 |
| 23 Mar. 1986 |
TOM
0 - 0
MAN
65%
21%
14%
|
28 | 29 | 1 | 0 |
| 16 Mar. 1986 |
MAN
3 - 2
VAL
41%
27%
33%
|
26 | 34 | 8 | +2 |