UB Conquense vs Daimiel analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
77.5%
Win probability
2.33
Expected goals
9-0
<0%
+9
<0%
8-0
0.1%
9-1
<0%
+8
0.1%
7-0
0.4%
8-1
0.1%
+7
0.5%
6-0
1.3%
7-1
0.2%
8-2
<0%
+6
1.5%
5-0
3.2%
6-1
0.7%
7-2
0.1%
+5
4%
4-0
6.9%
5-1
1.8%
6-2
0.2%
7-3
<0%
+4
8.9%
3-0
11.9%
4-1
3.8%
5-2
0.5%
6-3
<0%
+3
16.2%
2-0
15.3%
3-1
6.5%
4-2
1%
5-3
0.1%
+2
22.9%
1-0
13.1%
2-1
8.4%
3-2
1.8%
4-3
0.2%
5-4
<0%
+1
23.5%
15.4%
Draw
0-0
5.6%
1-1
7.2%
2-2
2.3%
3-3
0.3%
4-4
<0%
0
15.4%
7%
Win probability
0.55
Expected goals
0-1
3.1%
1-2
2%
2-3
0.4%
3-4
0%
-1
5.5%
0-2
0.8%
1-3
0.4%
2-4
0.1%
-2
1.3%
0-3
0.2%
1-4
0%
-3
0.2%
0-4
0%
-4
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
+5%
+33%
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
UB Conquense
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03 Mar. 1996 |
UBC
1 - 2
AZU
71%
18%
11%
|
29 | 21 | 8 | 0 |
| 25 Feb. 1996 |
HEL
3 - 0
UBC
53%
25%
21%
|
30 | 29 | 1 | -1 |
| 18 Feb. 1996 |
UBC
0 - 0
VIL
60%
23%
17%
|
30 | 28 | 2 | 0 |
| 11 Feb. 1996 |
AZU
0 - 2
UBC
35%
29%
37%
|
30 | 22 | 8 | 0 |
| 04 Feb. 1996 |
UBC
2 - 0
MAN
32%
29%
40%
|
27 | 37 | 10 | +3 |
Matches
Daimiel
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03 Mar. 1996 |
DAI
2 - 2
CAM
37%
27%
36%
|
19 | 22 | 3 | 0 |
| 25 Feb. 1996 |
AZU
0 - 0
DAI
64%
21%
15%
|
19 | 22 | 3 | 0 |
| 18 Feb. 1996 |
DAI
1 - 1
GUA
24%
27%
49%
|
19 | 26 | 7 | 0 |
| 11 Feb. 1996 |
HEL
3 - 0
DAI
79%
14%
6%
|
19 | 29 | 10 | 0 |
| 04 Feb. 1996 |
DAI
2 - 2
VIL
25%
27%
49%
|
19 | 26 | 7 | 0 |