Palmes CD vs CD Cea analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
65.6%
Win probability
2.75
Expected goals
10-0
<0%
+10
<0%
9-0
<0%
10-1
<0%
+9
0.1%
8-0
0.1%
9-1
0.1%
10-2
<0%
+8
0.2%
7-0
0.4%
8-1
0.2%
9-2
<0%
+7
0.6%
6-0
0.9%
7-1
0.5%
8-2
0.1%
9-3
<0%
+6
1.6%
5-0
2%
6-1
1.3%
7-2
0.4%
8-3
0.1%
+5
3.8%
4-0
3.7%
5-1
2.9%
6-2
0.9%
7-3
0.2%
8-4
<0%
+4
7.7%
3-0
5.4%
4-1
5.2%
5-2
2%
6-3
0.4%
7-4
0.1%
+3
13.2%
2-0
5.9%
3-1
7.6%
4-2
3.7%
5-3
1%
6-4
0.2%
7-5
<0%
+2
18.4%
1-0
4.3%
2-1
8.3%
3-2
5.4%
4-3
1.7%
5-4
0.3%
6-5
<0%
+1
20.1%
16.7%
Draw
0-0
1.6%
1-1
6.1%
2-2
5.9%
3-3
2.5%
4-4
0.6%
5-5
0.1%
6-6
<0%
0
16.7%
17.6%
Win probability
1.41
Expected goals
0-1
2.2%
1-2
4.3%
2-3
2.8%
3-4
0.9%
4-5
0.2%
5-6
0%
-1
10.3%
0-2
1.6%
1-3
2%
2-4
1%
3-5
0.3%
4-6
0%
-2
4.8%
0-3
0.7%
1-4
0.7%
2-5
0.3%
3-6
0.1%
-3
1.8%
0-4
0.3%
1-5
0.2%
2-6
0.1%
3-7
0%
-4
0.5%
0-5
0.1%
1-6
0%
2-7
0%
-5
0.1%
0-6
0%
-6
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
+200%
+598%
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
Palmes CD
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar. 2016 |
BMI
1 - 2
PAL
30%
21%
49%
|
11 | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| 05 Mar. 2016 |
PAL
2 - 2
LEI
66%
17%
17%
|
11 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| 28 Feb. 2016 |
COV
1 - 2
PAL
75%
14%
11%
|
10 | 14 | 4 | +1 |
| 21 Feb. 2016 |
PAL
4 - 3
ARR
30%
21%
50%
|
9 | 13 | 4 | +1 |
| 14 Feb. 2016 |
COL
1 - 0
PAL
44%
21%
35%
|
10 | 10 | 0 | -1 |
Matches
CD Cea
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar. 2016 |
CEA
1 - 1
ARN
33%
22%
45%
|
9 | 12 | 3 | 0 |
| 06 Mar. 2016 |
MEL
2 - 1
CEA
48%
21%
31%
|
10 | 10 | 0 | -1 |
| 28 Feb. 2016 |
CEA
5 - 3
CAL
42%
21%
36%
|
9 | 10 | 1 | +1 |
| 21 Feb. 2016 |
CEA
4 - 1
BMI
40%
21%
39%
|
7 | 9 | 2 | +2 |
| 14 Feb. 2016 |
LEI
3 - 0
CEA
60%
19%
21%
|
7 | 10 | 3 | 0 |