FC Carl Zeiss Jena vs Lok Stendal analysis

FC Carl Zeiss Jena Lok Stendal
63 ELO 50
-9.5% Tilt -9.4%
2073º General ELO ranking 10960º
81º Country ELO ranking 536º
ELO win probability
65.7%
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
20.7%
Draw
13.7%
Lok Stendal

Possible results

Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
65.7%
Win probability
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
1.97
Expected goals
8-0
<0%
+8
<0%
7-0
0.1%
8-1
<0%
+7
0.2%
6-0
0.5%
7-1
0.1%
8-2
<0%
+6
0.6%
5-0
1.6%
6-1
0.4%
7-2
<0%
+5
2%
4-0
4.1%
5-1
1.2%
6-2
0.2%
7-3
<0%
+4
5.5%
3-0
8.3%
4-1
3.1%
5-2
0.5%
6-3
<0%
+3
11.9%
2-0
12.6%
3-1
6.3%
4-2
1.2%
5-3
0.1%
+2
20.2%
1-0
12.8%
2-1
9.6%
3-2
2.4%
4-3
0.3%
5-4
<0%
+1
25.2%
20.7%
Draw
0-0
6.5%
1-1
9.8%
2-2
3.7%
3-3
0.6%
4-4
0.1%
0
20.7%
13.7%
Win probability
Lok Stendal
0.76
Expected goals
0-1
5%
1-2
3.7%
2-3
0.9%
3-4
0.1%
-1
9.8%
0-2
1.9%
1-3
0.9%
2-4
0.2%
3-5
0%
-2
3%
0-3
0.5%
1-4
0.2%
2-5
0%
-3
0.7%
0-4
0.1%
1-5
0%
-4
0.1%
0-5
0%
-5
<0%

ELO Graph/Inclination

← Defensive Tilt Attacking →
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
-11%
+16%
Lok Stendal

ELO progression

FC Carl Zeiss Jena
Lok Stendal
Next opponents in ELO points

Matches

FC Carl Zeiss Jena
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
1%
X%
2%
ELO ELO Cont. ▵ELO ±ELO
11 Mar. 1995
BSV
Stahl Brandenburg
2 - 3
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
CZJ
35%
29%
36%
62 41 21 0
04 Mar. 1995
CZJ
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
2 - 0
Hertha BSC II
HER
70%
19%
12%
62 44 18 0
19 Feb. 1995
SSV
Spandauer SV
0 - 2
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
CZJ
40%
28%
32%
62 47 15 0
11 Feb. 1995
CZJ
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
5 - 1
Hertha Zehlendorf
HZE
62%
22%
16%
61 46 15 +1
04 Feb. 1995
ERF
Rot-Weiss Erfurt
0 - 0
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
CZJ
45%
27%
28%
61 53 8 0

Matches

Lok Stendal
Lok Stendal
1%
X%
2%
ELO ELO Cont. ▵ELO ±ELO
12 Mar. 1995
LAS
Lok Stendal
0 - 2
Energie Cottbus
COT
43%
26%
31%
51 59 8 0
04 Mar. 1995
BFC
BFC Dynamo
1 - 1
Lok Stendal
LAS
77%
16%
8%
51 71 20 0
19 Feb. 1995
LAS
Lok Stendal
1 - 0
Türkiyemspor Berlin
TUR
75%
16%
9%
51 33 18 0
12 Feb. 1995
LAS
Lok Stendal
1 - 0
Stahl Brandenburg
BSV
69%
19%
13%
50 41 9 +1
05 Feb. 1995
HER
Hertha BSC II
0 - 2
Lok Stendal
LAS
59%
23%
19%
49 46 3 +1