Comprest GIM vs Tunari analysis
Possible results


ELO Graph/Inclination
ELO progression


Matches

1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 Mar. 2011 |
COM
![]() 0 - 0
![]() DUN
32%
24%
44%
|
35 | 43 | 8 | 0 |
04 Mar. 2011 |
CAL
![]() 0 - 1
![]() COM
64%
21%
15%
|
34 | 47 | 13 | +1 |
04 Dec. 2010 |
CPM
![]() 2 - 4
![]() COM
44%
23%
33%
|
33 | 29 | 4 | +1 |
26 Nov. 2010 |
COM
![]() 3 - 1
![]() ARG
31%
24%
45%
|
30 | 40 | 10 | +3 |
19 Nov. 2010 |
EFO
![]() 3 - 0
![]() COM
52%
24%
24%
|
32 | 37 | 5 | -2 |
Matches

1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 Mar. 2011 |
TUN
![]() 3 - 0
![]() ABC
80%
14%
7%
|
37 | 16 | 21 | 0 |
11 Mar. 2011 |
BER
![]() 2 - 0
![]() TUN
65%
20%
15%
|
38 | 45 | 7 | -1 |
04 Mar. 2011 |
TUN
![]() 5 - 1
![]() SMB
62%
21%
17%
|
38 | 30 | 8 | 0 |
03 Dec. 2010 |
UNI
![]() 4 - 1
![]() TUN
71%
17%
12%
|
38 | 48 | 10 | 0 |
19 Nov. 2010 |
DUN
![]() 3 - 2
![]() TUN
61%
21%
19%
|
39 | 41 | 2 | -1 |