ATM vs UiTM analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
71.7%
Win probability
2.76
Expected goals
10-0
<0%
+10
<0%
9-0
0.1%
10-1
<0%
+9
0.1%
8-0
0.2%
9-1
0.1%
+8
0.2%
7-0
0.5%
8-1
0.2%
9-2
<0%
+7
0.7%
6-0
1.3%
7-1
0.6%
8-2
0.1%
9-3
<0%
+6
2%
5-0
2.8%
6-1
1.4%
7-2
0.3%
8-3
<0%
+5
4.5%
4-0
5%
5-1
3.1%
6-2
0.8%
7-3
0.1%
8-4
<0%
+4
9%
3-0
7.2%
4-1
5.6%
5-2
1.7%
6-3
0.3%
7-4
<0%
+3
14.9%
2-0
7.9%
3-1
8.1%
4-2
3.1%
5-3
0.6%
6-4
0.1%
+2
19.8%
1-0
5.7%
2-1
8.8%
3-2
4.5%
4-3
1.2%
5-4
0.2%
6-5
<0%
+1
20.4%
15.4%
Draw
0-0
2.1%
1-1
6.4%
2-2
4.9%
3-3
1.7%
4-4
0.3%
5-5
<0%
0
15.4%
12.8%
Win probability
1.12
Expected goals
0-1
2.3%
1-2
3.6%
2-3
1.8%
3-4
0.5%
4-5
0.1%
-1
8.3%
0-2
1.3%
1-3
1.3%
2-4
0.5%
3-5
0.1%
4-6
0%
-2
3.3%
0-3
0.5%
1-4
0.4%
2-5
0.1%
3-6
0%
-3
1%
0-4
0.1%
1-5
0.1%
2-6
0%
-4
0.2%
0-5
0%
1-6
0%
-5
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
ATM
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb. 2017 |
TCY
1 - 1
ATM
62%
20%
18%
|
37 | 48 | 11 | 0 |
| 10 Feb. 2017 |
SAB
2 - 5
ATM
48%
23%
29%
|
35 | 35 | 0 | +2 |
| 03 Feb. 2017 |
ATM
1 - 5
JOH
21%
23%
56%
|
37 | 51 | 14 | -2 |
| 26 Jan. 2017 |
MIS
2 - 3
ATM
71%
17%
12%
|
36 | 48 | 12 | +1 |
| 20 Jan. 2017 |
PER
1 - 1
ATM
58%
22%
21%
|
37 | 43 | 6 | -1 |
Matches
UiTM
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb. 2017 |
AIR
1 - 2
UIT
12%
18%
70%
|
33 | 10 | 23 | 0 |
| 10 Feb. 2017 |
UIT
2 - 2
PER
28%
20%
52%
|
32 | 39 | 7 | +1 |
| 03 Feb. 2017 |
KUL
1 - 1
UIT
75%
15%
10%
|
32 | 43 | 11 | 0 |
| 21 Oct. 2016 |
SAB
1 - 2
UIT
73%
16%
12%
|
31 | 38 | 7 | +1 |
| 23 Sep. 2016 |
UIT
2 - 5
PER
25%
20%
55%
|
33 | 42 | 9 | -2 |