Apeldoorn CSV vs Be Quick .28 analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of handicap
45%
Win probability
1.6
Expected goals
7-0
<0%
+7
<0%
6-0
0.1%
7-1
<0%
+6
0.2%
5-0
0.5%
6-1
0.2%
7-2
<0%
+5
0.7%
4-0
1.5%
5-1
0.6%
6-2
0.1%
7-3
<0%
+4
2.3%
3-0
3.9%
4-1
2%
5-2
0.4%
6-3
<0%
+3
6.3%
2-0
7.3%
3-1
4.9%
4-2
1.2%
5-3
0.2%
6-4
<0%
+2
13.6%
1-0
9.1%
2-1
9.2%
3-2
3.1%
4-3
0.5%
5-4
0.1%
+1
22%
24.6%
Draw
0-0
5.7%
1-1
11.5%
2-2
5.8%
3-3
1.3%
4-4
0.2%
5-5
<0%
0
24.6%
30.4%
Win probability
1.27
Expected goals
0-1
7.2%
1-2
7.3%
2-3
2.5%
3-4
0.4%
4-5
0%
-1
17.5%
0-2
4.6%
1-3
3.1%
2-4
0.8%
3-5
0.1%
-2
8.6%
0-3
1.9%
1-4
1%
2-5
0.2%
3-6
0%
-3
3.1%
0-4
0.6%
1-5
0.2%
2-6
0%
-4
0.9%
0-5
0.2%
1-6
0.1%
-5
0.2%
0-6
0%
-6
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
Apeldoorn CSV
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar. 2010 |
APE
0 - 1
EXC
40%
25%
35%
|
41 | 44 | 3 | 0 |
| 13 Mar. 2010 |
GEN
2 - 2
APE
44%
24%
32%
|
41 | 39 | 2 | 0 |
| 06 Mar. 2010 |
APE
0 - 3
HHC
43%
25%
32%
|
43 | 43 | 0 | -2 |
| 27 Feb. 2010 |
BER
2 - 2
APE
48%
24%
28%
|
43 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 Dec. 2009 |
APE
2 - 0
FLE
37%
25%
38%
|
41 | 45 | 4 | +2 |
Matches
Be Quick .28
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar. 2010 |
BEQ
2 - 2
NUN
56%
23%
22%
|
40 | 37 | 3 | 0 |
| 06 Mar. 2010 |
BEQ
4 - 0
WHC
43%
25%
32%
|
38 | 40 | 2 | +2 |
| 27 Feb. 2010 |
GOA
3 - 2
BEQ
28%
24%
48%
|
39 | 30 | 9 | -1 |
| 20 Feb. 2010 |
BEQ
3 - 0
PKC
64%
19%
17%
|
39 | 30 | 9 | 0 |
| 23 Jan. 2010 |
HHC
3 - 0
BEQ
56%
22%
22%
|
40 | 42 | 2 | -1 |